Large payload robots up to kg. European Headquater, Sales and Service. Sperberweg 29, Living guide, a guidebook for maternal health, Japanese language schools, disaster information, medical facilities where staff can Official homepage of Kawasaki City, Kanagawa Prefecture Hello Kawasaki Living in Kawasaki and event information , multi-language living guide medical facilities, consultation office,. They should carefully read the Manuals and other related safety documents.
Products described in this catalogue are general industrial robots. Mar 3, Country Home Products, Inc. Meigs Road. Box Vergennes, VT Kawasaki — 17 HP. See your engine manufacturer's owner's manual Provides instructions on how to use the teaching system installed on the PC, connected to the robot and its controller, for developing and managing programs. Nov 24, Thank you for purchasing our robot products. Please carefully read this manual and other related manuals before installing the Please read it carefully; information and instructions furnished can help you achieve years of dependable performance.
A separate Engine Owner's Manual is included with your owner's packet which contains Number of the Patent in Japan and Overseas. We will use our integrated technological expertise to create values that point the way to the future. User's Manual. Banner Engineering Corp. D — R Sep 17, No part of this publication may be reproduced, transmitted, transcribed, stored in a retrieval system, or translated into any language or computer language, in any form by any means, electronic, mechanical, magnetic, optical, chemical, manual or otherwise, without the prior agreement and written.
We also performed manual screening of the bibliographies of primary studies and review articles and contacted authors for The Engine Owner's Manual provides information regarding the U. Electrical Schematic — Kawasaki. Do not use a nozzle lock-open device. Dec 17, Typological information has been used to guide language transfer mostly in the areas of part-of-speech tagging and parsing Sharpness: 10 Handling: 10 Value: 10 Camera Used: spotmatc and praktica mtl3.
I got this lens for free, I have only used i with film. I wonder if the difference between my sharpness rating and the other PF members is because it is not designed for digital sencors.
Lens Review Date: October 1, Takumar build quality. Small body size. Great color rendition, highlights and shadows. Lens Review Date: September 26, Size, weight, handling, sharp and contrasty mostly.
Easily picks up veiling flare which reduces contrast, average aberration correction. I have the Super Multi Coated variant and overall I wasn't impressed with this lens. It's small, light, well built and fun to use but has flaws. Sharpness is OK, there's some field curvature that affects the midfield resolution. Rendering is usually contrasty and nicely saturated which is very good.
The one flaw that seems to heavily affect this lens is veiling flare. With bright contrasting light anywhere in the frame and even slightly outside of it contrast is reduced across the entire image. A hood doesn't seem to help much here either, the large front element is a light magnet.
Scenes with high dynamic range will often have less contrast and saturation when compared to scenes that are rather flat or devoid of contrasting light. Aberration correction is about average as well and improved upon stopping down. Overall this lens performs worse than all of its K-Mount siblings, when general photography is of concern I would choose any of them over this one if I could.
It may be worth it to explore other options for this focal length and mount combo. Based on my research, a few lenses come to mind. The Fujinon 28mm 3. I believe there is also a Komine-made Vivitar 28mm 2. You could also choose to go wider and pick the 24mm or 20mm Takumars, they seem to fare better than this lens overall. Lens Review Date: September 17, Most people reviewing a lens ignore the massive influences of these on lens performance, so what you are reading is a review about how their digital systems accepted the lens and it's imaging; not the lens in itself.
Mine was the SMC version. It was a lovely lens, but it is now hyped and cultish; so quality is exaggerated in many cases. It must be the latest internet feeding frenzy to put one of these on expensive mirrorless cameras, or something. On some auction sites this is being artificially pushed up in cost to more than a Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon; which is a real joke and shows how people can be so easily misled.
It's good quality, but nowhere close to a Flektogon. The Takumar 28mm is also not any better than a Takumar 35mm, and is probably not as good. Taking into account you only get a tiny difference in range of field 7mm you may as well get a 35mm and take a couple of steps back when you take a photo, to be honest. It's about the same size and weight as a Takumar 55mm lens.
Neat and smooth to focus. Superb range of focus in a small turning circle, so you don't have to fiddle about focussing too much. Great if you don't want to make the effort to refocus every time. Feels wonderful to use. Half clicks to F11 and then one to f Good width of vision.
Most lenses have a sweet spot between f5. Very good at f5. Mine was not that sharp at infinity around the edges; which is a terrible shame. Aperture f8 tended to be the better hole for most images.
For an "SMC" lens the coating is not stunning to the naked eye, especially in the tiny little rear cluster glass sections. It's nowhere near as rich as the Pentax "SMC" range that was coming out through the 's and 80's. Flare is occasionally noticeable when strong light sources are directly at the glass or glancing across the lens face, so put a 49mm coated neutral filter on and use a hood if that is going to be your shoot.
Edge distortion - which worsens the CA and edge blur - is a little "bendy" but for the 28mm wide angle, you need to accept this in most lenses from the 's. The not-so-strong features about this lens are linked to the design and build.
The manufacturer had used a very odd double front screw-in mechanism at the front that is different to the usual Takumar front glass arrangement used in the 's.
It makes servicing and getting a good seal there very difficult. These lenses are susceptible to lots of fungus, air and dirt incursion, especially around the front ring.
Another reason to use a filter. Lots of dust - and therefore inevitable fungus - in the rear section are likely, too. And the glass pieces are so tiny back there - with huge magnifying effect through this lens - that dust can magnify and ruin images quite easily, as can glass scratches on the front element.
I assume marks on the rear glass will have a very bad effect on an image as it's a tiny bit of glass. Check your potential buy before you part with your cash. If you have a clean haze-free version, this is a great lens. If you have a dirty version, your image will be noticeably worse; especially when shooting into the light.
In my view and experience the 35mm Takumar M42 thread is narrowly better on most counts. And the SMC M series bayonet is not so ruined in hyped-up secondhand prices. Lens Review Date: April 16, Very good condition and quality of build. Camera Used: Sony Nex Just got this lens having read some of the above and took the plunge on buying from my favourite charity website. I've got the 49mm f16 minimum Super Takumar version No 3 In excellent condition with hardly a dint in its armour.
Looks good mounted on the Sony being nice and neat in size. Hopefully will do some photography but not nice out at the moment. Lens Review Date: February 12, This lens came from a local flea market, it was in a perfectly brand new condition, which explains the price. It is the 4th variant of the series and it isn't a pixel peeper lens but it is sharp enough with minimal cropping. Lens Review Date: January 9, I bought this lens used years ago twice probably the summer of 99 or and it has been one of my most used lenses.
For me on full frame with my spotmatic F this was one of the lenses that almost lived on the camera. Most of my shots were from this lens or my mm. It has been well used in the years I have owned it and while it now it has worn off paint in spots and some scratches on the lens barrel it is still in great working order.
Now on digital I find I don't use it all that often for regular photography probably because with the crop it is an unfamiliar focal length for me. However I have found it to be an excellent lens to stick on some extension tubes or reverse mount for doing some macro shots.
On extension tubes using the 1 9mm Pentax extension tube it gives some really nice results. Sticking it on the 19 or 28mm one however I find puts me a bit too close a lot of times. Also this lens is great reverse mounted giving about a macro. I have gotten good results also reverse mounting buy also throwing up to the 28mm extension tube in the mix as well giving about a macro. Lens Review Date: December 19, All has been said and more on this lens in all past reviews.
I just want to add that the centre sharpness is exceptional at all apertures, even at f Posted are the photos at ISO , f3. I used 5 test charts pasted on a 24" x 36" pegboard which seem to be fairly accurate with my new K1 mark II and noticed that the centre image sharpness may be shown as being as low as 4.
Tweaking the focus in live view using "focus peaking" shows results down to 4. Other findings are lower edge sharpness, normal edge distortion, minimal CA, medium contrast, no light fall-off.
At f3. Posts: 1. Lens Review Date: April 27, I own the latest version of this lens. Tested it using a Sony Alpha 7 II. Photo attached. It is also very sharp. Handling and build are awesome, I love using it. Regarding flare, I have a Hoya UV 0 filter on it and there is no problem.
Lens Review Date: August 13, Great colors, well built, small, easy focus. I was a little hesitant about purchasing this lens because of the variations in the ratings. Some people rated the sharpness as high as 10, while others rated the sharpness as low as 6, in any case I took a chance. This is my 3rd Takumar f3. The 35mm is one of my favorite lenses, the 24mm not so much. The thing I found striking about this lens is the accurate colors it produces.
With this lens the playback image was pretty close to real-life, the colors were so accurate. Sure this lens like all Takumars in the f3. Actually this saves me a step in post processing since I like the colors to look vibrant in my pictures. When it comes to sharpness I gave this lens an 8 wish I could give it an 8. It will not give you that special "3D look" that the other lenses I mentioned will give you, although I only had it for a week and did not get a chance to test it under a variety of situations.
However the sharpness is adequate enough and certainly does not deserve the low rating of '6' some users gave it at least not my copy. Being that this lens is only a f3. Nevertheless, I did not see any harsh, or busy areas in the out of focus backgrounds when using it. Things looked relatively smooth to me. Again I only had this lens for a short time so my experience is limited. Some people might call this an "outdoor lens" because of its limited light gathering capacity, but this lens can also be used indoors if you boost the ISO a bit, somewhere around , or you can use flash.
The soft corners I read about? You really have to pixel-peep to find them even wide open, most of the time you wont even notice at least I didn't. My copy came in almost mint-like condition, clean glass with a few small scratches on the casing here and there, but no fading of the paint or anything like that So I can say I'm pretty satisfied for the price I paid for it. On a cropped camera like my K-5 II this lens gives me the equivalent of a 42mm lens on a FF, which is a little wider than my 35mm and 31mm, great for street photography.
I found this lens easier to focus than all my other Takumar lenses, not sure why, but it seems to give you a little bit more leeway as to when the focusing light comes on and off. Also, anything past 20 feet will be in focus as compared to 30 feet on my other lenses.
This makes it great for landscape photography since you only have to do minimal focusing if any at all.
0コメント